Sounded Simple wrote this for me a while back. It creates a new random number each time the mouse button is clicked. It is an Auto Hot Key script, so you will need to have that installed for it to work properly.
Hey all! It’s been a long time since I’ve done a video so I did a 4-tabling session at 100NL on Poker Stars for a bit of fun. In this video I discuss how I’ve been playing these games which includes a premium on blind stealing. Definitely leave me some comments here!
You can download the video here.
I compressed this using WinRar. You may need to download a trial copy of it here.
In my last article I spoke about the advantages of using a generally exploitive strategy to take advantage of your weaker opponents. I adamantly believe that too many poker players are worried too much about giving up some information and not enough about exploiting their opponents.
A lot of players choose their postflop betting lines based on having a balancing strategy. The logic usually goes with something like “I will bet in this spot when I miss, so therefore I have to bet when I hit”, or vice versa.
That is the entire logic behind a play.
Doesn’t this seem a little fuzzy to anyone? Read more about the balancing act
In poker, as in many things it in life, it is easy to take a concept and to apply it incorrectly. This can mean many things. This can mean playing too many hands on the button because positional advantage is huge. It can mean playing too many hands because you think you can “make up for it” postflop. It can mean playing too aggressively in certain situations. A poker concept that has spun violently out of control is playing in such a way that a good opponent cannot exploit you.
Where this concept is mostly applied is towards bet sizing. Many believe that if you vary your bet sizing with the strength of your hand that you opponents will be able to figure out what your hand is and take advantage of the accuracy of the range that they can assign to you. This is a fine argument if it is taken for just that. Read more about this overemphasized concept
(5 out of 5) (5 out of 5) (5 out of 5) (5 out of 5) (5 out of 5)